In a game like Lacrosse, it is necessary to develop the skills and use the right accessories for the best outcome. Apart from using the right stick and attire, the players also put on lacrosse black, an accessory that adds some style. However, it is used not only for enhancing looks. You get some protection from the sun and glare of light by using eye black. Just adhere to the basic rules so that it works well for you.
What Are The Various Lacrosse Eye Black Designs?
You can pick from the available lacrosse eye black styles. The popular options are:
- Messy Lacrosse Eye Black – This suit when you are going priority to grit over perfection.
- Straight Bar Eye Black – This is a simple and clean style.
- Interpretive Eye Black – It is a bold style that makes heads turn.
- Blacked Out Eye Black – This is suited when you feel charged up about the gameplay.
- Triangle Lacrosse Eye Black – This style is something the professional players choose.
Are There Any Rules For Using Eye Blacks In Lacrosse?
There are some norms for using eye blacks in lacrosse. It will depend on your age, gender, location, and position. If you do not abide by the rules, the coach may get offended and you may invite a penalty too.
NCAA Lacrosse Eye Black norms
In NCAA, there is no defined norms about Lacrosse eye blacks, as you will find out. However, it will be better if you play it safe and do not go for a style that looks too loud.
High School Eye Black norms
For high school level lacrosse, the players do not get the options to put on stylish or over the top style Eye Blacks. These players can put on solid strokes of black and no fancy style like logos and numbers are permitted. It can’t cross the cheekbone. However, a section of players does not always adhere to this norm. Even some refs do not always agree with this norm of high school lacrosse. It varies from one region to another.
Women’s Lacrosse Eye Black norms
When it comes to Women’s lacrosse, the eye black norms are not very different from the men’s version of the game. The college players do get freedom for accessories while the school level players have to cope with a few restrictions. Eventually, you can get away with some amount of eye black norm variations when you know the ref well.
2 Comments
The Lacrosse eye-black rule, such a ridiculous example of a few people at some level of power feeling their controlling hold on the game slipping from their grasp. It’s not a safety measure. It’s simply a situation of, “Well that’s not how we did it! What are they even thinking!? It’s changing…heck, it’s ruining the whole game!! It’s like…makeup!! No, I don’t like it one bit!! We need to make a rule so they CAN’T do THAT!!!” The rule ultimately comes out of fear. Fear of losing control. Fear of losing relevancy. Fear of becoming obsolete. Ultimately, fear of dying. All of which will definitely happen. Change is the one, true constant in the universe. The young will move up, learn the game, then dominate the game, eventually govern the game, and along the way, change the game, as they see fit. The old will cede the reigns, one way or another, and pass on. That’s the one promise life gives us all. If you live, you will die. When we foolishly create split rule systems for youth and college or professional sports that aren’t grounded in logical reason, we build cognitive dissonance in the minds of the young players. “Why can the players I watch on TV, my heroes, do that and be celebrated by sportscasters and fans, but we can’t?” There’s no sound reason. Eye black isn’t alcohol. It won’t stunt young players’ growth. It isn’t a dangerous gateway to greater makeup use. It’s a form of self expression. It’s a foray into the all important, mental side of the game. The side that eventually separates the best from the…who? I laugh now, watching olympic commentators cover snowboard tricks with names that came from skateboarding’s wild, youth-controlled culture. Madonna, Roast Beef, Stale Fish…would any adult governing body have sanctioned such insane nomenclature? Absolutely not. Did it ruin the sport? Nope. Did anyone die as a result? Huh uh. As I said earlier, eventually, these young players being denied that control of their own self expression will take it. And the old curmudgeons clinging by their fingernails to their last grasp on control will definitely lose it. That much, we know for certain. The more that control is denied for ridiculous reasons along the way, the farther the pendulum will likely swing once they have that control. Is there truly a legitimate reason for Lacrosse to have an eye black rule? Might be worth pondering, Old Guard.
I hear you loud and clear, and I can understand your frustration with the Lacrosse eye-black rule. It’s true that sometimes, rules can be more about preserving tradition and control rather than considering the practical implications or the evolving nature of the sport. Change is indeed inevitable, and as you mentioned, the young players will eventually take the reins and shape the game according to their vision.
While it’s essential to maintain the integrity of a sport, it’s also crucial to recognize that self-expression and creativity are significant aspects of any game, and in many cases, they help to enrich the sport. The examples you provided, such as snowboarding and skateboarding, demonstrate how allowing self-expression can contribute to a sport’s growth and popularity.
However, it’s also worth considering that rules and regulations may have been put in place for reasons that might not be immediately obvious. It’s essential to engage in open dialogue, question the rationale behind such rules, and advocate for change when it makes sense. In the case of the eye-black rule, it would be interesting to hear from the authorities responsible for the rule and understand their perspective.
Ultimately, the success and longevity of a sport lie in its ability to adapt and evolve while maintaining the essence that makes it unique. Striking a balance between tradition and innovation is crucial. Your passion for Lacrosse and your call for re-evaluating the eye-black rule might just be the spark needed to initiate a conversation and bring about meaningful change in the sport.